Category Archives: Huskies Football

Posts dealing with Huskies football

Huskies Post Game: Syracuse

The Huskies got their first win of the year last night at Husky Stadium against Syracuse, 41-20. The Dawgs’ struggled early on; there wasn’t any offensive rhythm and special team’s mistakes led to an early 10-0 lead for the Orange.  But, then the Huskies found it.  They played like the team we had planned on seeing this year.  They outscored Syracuse 41-10 through the rest of the game and it wasn’t much of a contest after the first couple plays in the second half.

Jermaine Kearse had a monster day (9 receptions for 179 yards), as the offense used big plays to dominate.  The defense was solid too.  They gave up two or three big plays but the two touchdowns Syracuse scored were because of a special teams penalty and a turnover.

I’ll review this one by taking a look at each position.  I haven’t been able to find a replay anywhere yet, FSN decided to show a replay of Wyoming and Texas instead, so I won’t be as thorough as I’d like to be but these were my first impressions from being there.  Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under UW Game Recaps

Husky Prediction: Week 2

So, all 4 of the good guys’ started 0-1 on the Huskies.  Now as Husky nation is in a state of panic, the Dawgs looks to get back on the winning side against Syracuse.  Frankly, I’m not sure why everyone is in a state of panic.  If you didn’t think this was a possibility before the season started than you didn’t know a ton about the Huskies or BYU.  Let’s move on and hope that this week is better!  On to the predictions:

Matthew:
I have no idea how this game is going to play out. I’d love to see the Huskies completely dominate for 60 minutes, but I have my doubts about that. I think Syracuse can put up a fight, and I’m still a little skeptical of the Huskies. Even so, there are too many factors in the Dawgs’ favor, namely an apparent big advantage in talent. The Huskies offensive playmakers should be the difference if the game ends up close. There’s a lot of talk around Syracuse about the improvement of the program under second year coach Doug Marrone. That might be the case, but I think 9:00 tomorrow night will find Syracuse in a similar position as UW was in after the BYU game: on the way back, but not quite as far along as they might have thought. Huskies get out to a big lead before Syracuse narrows the gap slightly late, but a comfortable win for UW.

UW 41- Syracuse 27

Andrew:
Let me start off by saying that Syracuse is better than most Husky fans think.  They aren’t even close to the same team that Jake Locker beat in his debut.  They also aren’t as good as some of the Syracuse fans seem to think.  Some of the comments coming from their players after beating Akron have made me laugh this week.  I expect a comfortable win but not a complete blow out.  I think the Orange compare to Arizona State last year as far as talent and how far along their program is.  Being at home will help the Dawgs win this one.  They also won’t be over-matched on the lines like they were at times last week.  Jake has a great game and Kearse redeems himself for the dropped passes last week.  The defensive line shows some improvement and the Huskies get their first win of the 2010 season.

UW 38 – Syracuse 20

Dan:
Landing between BYU and Nebraska, this matchup would normally scream trap game. However, Washington is not at a point where it can possibly assume victories, and I doubt anyone is overlooking Syracuse, a formidable BCS conference opponent. There are reasons for concern from what we witnessed in Provo, and everything I hear is how undervalued Syracuse is, and if the Orange can stay close and somehow pull out a victory, this season could unravel rapidly. But home field ought to prevail in this one and I look for the Huskies to get off to a quick start, and never look back.

UW 27-17

We’ll get Joe’s prediction up here soon but here’s this for now!  Go Dawgs!

Andrew

1 Comment

Filed under UW Game Previews

What I Want To See On Saturday

The Huskies loss to BYU was disappointing in so many ways.  It was the type of game, a road test against a beatable team, that the Huskies couldn’t win last year.  Beating BYU was a chance to start the season by answering questions.  A win would have set the team on a course to improve upon last year’s five wins and show that the team is moving rapidly toward sustained success.

The loss only brought more questions, and it failed to answer any that existed previously.  Are the Huskies improved from last year?  It didn’t appear so, but they didn’t look worse either.  Was all the offseason talk of improved strength and explosiveness just talk?  Can an experienced offensive line be consistently effective?  Will the defense build on a dominating end to the 2009 season?  All questions without clear answers, now one game deep in the season.

One game is still only one game, and this team wasn’t going to contend for the national championship no matter what, so the loss isn’t terribly damaging from a season or conference race standpoint.  Most teams start the season a little rusty, which is why teams play Toledo and UC-Davis and Sacramento State to start.  BYU vs. UW was one of the few games last weekend to combine two good teams, so the Huskies deserve at least a bit of a break.  They get their winnable game this weekend against Syracuse.

The problem with playing Syracuse is that it still won’t answer a lot of the questions.  Syracuse should be a lot easier to handle than BYU, which obviously is good.  This team needs wins anyway they can get them.  But even a win won’t necessarily say much about these Huskies.  Until they pull out a win on the road, it’s hard to judge this team to be anything different than it was last season.

All that said, there are certainly things to watch for this Saturday.  This game could go two ways.  Syracuse could be as bad as Dawg fans hope, and UW could be on the winning end of a blowout.  Syracuse could also be better than expected, or the Huskies worse, and Husky Stadium could see a tight game.  There are actually positives and negatives to each scenario.  A look at them after the jump. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Huskies Football

Syracuse Scouting Report

The Husky come home to face one of the weaker opponents on the schedule this week.  With that being said, Syracuse may not be the pushover people say they are.  Like BYU, I don’t know a ton about Syracuse and only had one game to scout from.  So, here goes my best shot at a scouting report (position by position).

Overview from last game:
Syracuse played at Akron last Saturday and won 29-3.  They didn’t truly pull away until the end of the 3rd quarter but they did win on the road and there’s something to be said for that, as we Husky fans know all too well.  The Syracuse defense was very solid throughout the game.  Of course, they were playing Akron but they definitely shut down their running game.  Their offense was okay.  They pounded the ball with the good running back that they have and that will be a common occurrence this season.  Their special teams were terrible, much like the Huskies but we’ll blame both teams on first game jitters and a little bit of bad luck.  The game is online at ESPN3 if you’re dying to watch it.  I did so I could write this but otherwise I wouldn’t recommend it.  It was a pretty boring game.

Quarterback:
Last season the Orange were led by former Duke basketball player Greg Paulus.  This year they hand the position over to Ryan Nassib.  Nassib did get some experience last season, completing 38 of 68 passes.  He was brought in for deep passing situations, so that tells us that he has a stronger arm than Greg Paulus.  In other words, that tells us nothing.  Nassib is elusive in the pocket, several times escaping Akron’s rush and dumping the ball off to a tight end or running back.  I didn’t see him throw down the field a ton but he seemed fairly accurate.  A couple of times he forced balls and that was his biggest drawback from what I could see.  The Huskies could get a chance for a few turnovers if he does that.  His backups are completely unproven.

Running Back:
Running back may be the best position the Orange (how have I not mentioned how lame their nickname is) have.  They have a senior, Delone Carter, who rushed for 1,021 yards last year.  Carter is a power back who runs between the tackles.  Akron loaded the box against him and that kept him in check for a good share of the game.  He still got his yards and is the kind of back where you don’t realize how many yards he picks up until you look at the stats after the game.  His backups are Antwon Bailey, who is another power back, and Prince Tyson-Gulley who is the explosive, make you miss guy in the offense.  He didn’t play much against Akron though.  Their fullback, Adam Harris, sounds like a pretty normal, solid fullback.

Wide Receivers/Tight End:
The Orange have a bunch of possession receivers and don’t seem to have any deep threats.  Their best receiver is probably Alec Lemon.  He caught 29 balls last season as a true freshman and is sure-handed.  The rest of the receivers don’t have a ton of experience and don’t seem like great playmakers.  Junior tight end, Nick Provo, might be the best receiver the Orange have and he’ll definitely be an asset on Saturday.  This group isn’t terrible but definitely lacks explosiveness.

Offensive Line:
The line only returns one guy from a unit that wasn’t very good last year.  Ryan Bartholomew is the returning starter and has switched to center after playing most of his career at guard.  The unit is built up to be physical and aggressive.  They aren’t as big as BYU but they aren’t small by any means (no one is under 287 lbs.).  There were no huge holes against Akron and they didn’t seem to dominate the game but Akron did load the box which made it a little bit hard to get a read on the running game.  They were okay in pass protection, not great though.  They have absolutely no depth, for what it’s worth.

Defensive Line:
The Orange were very good against the run last year and that started with the defensive line.  They lost their star defensive tackle, Arthur Jones, to graduation and their top defensive end to knee problems but the Orange still have a lot of experienced players on the line.  It’s tough to get a read on how good these guys are.  They got a lot of help from a solid linebacking crew behind them in the first game but there also weren’t a ton of holes Akron had to run through.  Again, it was Akron.  Their mascot is the Zips…

Linebackers:
Along with running back, this is the Orange’s best position.  They have two leaders, Derrell Smith and Doug Hogue, who are about as solid as they come.  Expect to hear their names a lot.  After those two guys, there’s a bunch of young players.  The other starter is true freshman, Marquis Spruill, who has good size and speed.  There isn’t much depth but the top two guys at this position make it strong.

Secondary:
The secondary was pretty bad last year but they do have experience now.  They didn’t impress me very much during the Akron game but they weren’t bad.  Mike Holmes is one of their corners and is pretty solid.  The rest of this group makes me think that the Huskies will be passing a lot on Saturday.

So, there you have it.  Hopefully this was a little bit helpful.  We’ll have predictions coming soon and more!

Andrew

Leave a comment

Filed under Huskies Football, UW Game Previews

Will College Gameday Pick NU-UW?

Amidst the frustration following Saturday’s loss to BYU, as if I wasn’t down enough, it occurred to me that College Gameday probably would not be coming to Seattle for the Nebraska game in week 3. Before the season began, there were rumblings that if Nebraska and Washington could handle their first two opponents, College Gameday would be very enticed by a week 3 matchup between NU and UW, especially if both teams were ranked. However, after losing to BYU, the Huskies will not be ranked heading into the Nebraska game, even if they throttle Syracuse. So can we officially cross UW off the possible week 3 sites to host Gameday? As Lee Corso would say, not so fast my friend! Working in Washington’s favor is a relatively weak slate of games in week 3, of which I’ve narrowed the list to 5 possibilities.

1—Clemson at (21) Auburn
This does not exactly scream game of the week, and I doubt it will be, but Clemson may be ranked by next week, and Auburn has a nice team. College Gameday loves those SEC crowds, and this one is already set for a 7pm ET kickoff, but ultimately there are better games to choose from.

2—Florida (8) at Tennessee
The annual week 3 rivalry is usually about as marquee as it gets, but the Vols are really down this year, and this game doesn’t have the luster it normally does. If Oregon beats up on Tennessee this weekend, I highly doubt Gameday will choose Rocky Top for it’s next host, especially given how many more great SEC matchups will present itself as the year goes on.

3—Iowa (9) at Arizona
Both Arizona and Iowa have easy games in week 2, so this will certainly be a matchup of 2-0 teams. Arizona also may be ranked at this point, and Nick Foles is a player the nation needs to see, but Tucson hosted College Gameday just last season, which probably decreases the likelihood of returning so soon. Still, this is a top 3 game in week 3 to be sure.

4—Arkansas (14) at Georgia (22)
A hesiman contender, SEC matchup, two ranked opponents—this game has a lot that Gameday looks for. But as mentioned, good SEC matchups are a dime a dozen, and if Gameday wants to see Ryan Mallett and Arkansas, why not wait one more week until they host #1 Alabama, or in week 5 vs. Texas A&M, or week 6 at Auburn? Georgia also has a ton of big games, most notably in week 9 against Florida. This is a contender to be sure, but there are better opportunities down the road for Gameday to consider. Also, if Georgia stumbles at South Carolina in week 2, this game is likely out of the running.

5—Nebraska (6) at Washington
It’s hard to believe that since College Gameday hit the road with their game of the week format, Montlake has never hosted the prime time affair. UW has been the road team in just 3 Gameday contests; ’98 at Nebraska,’02 at Michigan, and ’03 at Ohio State. The Gameday crew has made mention of their desire to do a game at Washington, and this seems like the perfect opportunity. Locker’s heisman hype may have taken a hit last week, but he is still pegged to be the top pick in the NFL draft. Throw in the Sarkisian era in year 2, Pete Carroll coaching in the same town, and a Huskies-Huskers matchup that has history, and you have a load of storylines that ESPN would love to cover. UW won’t be a top 25 team by week 3, but Nebraska is ranked 6th, and after the well documented USC upset last year, this game has upset special written all over it.

Andrew brings up a good point about Notre Dame at Michigan State being a possible big game in week 3, especially if ND can handle Michigan at home this weekend. Kickoff is 8pm ET in East Lansing, a natural time slot for Gameday to partner with ABC’s Saturday Night Football.

To recap, this weekend root for Michigan over Notre Dame, South Carolina over Georgia, Oregon over Tennessee, and of course Washington over Syracuse! If these chips fall in place, Gameday in Seattle may be a reality.

-Dan

5 Comments

Filed under Huskies Football

Glaring Numbers–Game 1

O: Husky points in the 2nd half

-39: Will Mahan’s rushing yards total

131: The passing yards total by both Jake Heaps and Riley Nelson. Neither were exceptional, but both QB’s were effective for different reasons, and the combination kept UW on it’s heels.

25:53: Time of Posession for UW. In comparison, BYU had the ball for 34:07. That’s half a quarter more, and in a tight game, those 8+ minutes are valuable.

14: The average yard line UW began it’s drive on. On 11 drives, the yard line UW started on was their own…27, 2, 20, 12, 1, 20, 7, 16, 14, 20, 25.
Conversely, BYU’s 12 drives began on…22, 21, 30, UW 47, 29, 43, 31, UW 48, 20, 23, 20, 27.

So that’s 6 drives Washington started inside it’s 20. Field position is an underrated aspect of a game, and probably the biggest culprit for Washington never finding it’s offensive rhythm was it’s horrible starting position. The playbook is very restricted inside your own 10.

36: Combined tackles by Mason Foster (14), Nate Williams (12), and Victor Aiyewa (10). Good performance by those 3 guys.

13: Consecutive road losses. The last road win came at Stanford on 11/3/07. If the Huskies do not win at USC or at Arizona, the road skid will hit 15 games, spanning 3+ years. Ouch.

2: Rating on my 1-10 “Memorable Game Scale.” This game was not very exciting, and like many 1st games, it was just weird. There was no rhythm from the Huskies offense (thanks to horrible field position), and there were a ton of 1st game mistakes. A lot of the special teams miscues we saw Saturday probably won’t happen again all year. I also wouldn’t be surprised if this ends up being the only game that the Huskies don’t score a point in the 2nd half. 2 years from now, I won’t remember much from this game.

-Dan

Leave a comment

Filed under Huskies Football, UW Game Recaps

Huskies Post-Game

Well, I guess it’s time one of us do this.  We’ve had over 24 hours to digest a disappointing loss and now I am a little more rational than I was a night ago.

Let me start off by saying that this wasn’t the team we planned on seeing.  This wasn’t the team that had taken a step above last year’s.  Sure, there were some aspects of the team that improved (more on that later) but as a whole this wasn’t the team we expected to see.  This was the Husky team that lost to Arizona State and UCLA on the road last year.  That team wasn’t terrible, but wasn’t good either.  We saw moments where the Huskies looked like a team that was about to take it to the next level but those moments didn’t last.  Will the Huskies become that team?  There is no reason to give up hope on that after the first game.

The game started off the way it was supposed to.  The Dawgs were clearly the better team.  They were faster.  They had more weapons.  They looked like they wanted it more.  Then everything bounced BYU’s way.  A couple of stupid penalties led to a field position switch and the good bounces for BYU became evident with every punt.  Seriously, think about the game (assuming you watched it) and try to remember a bounce that went the Huskies way.  It was unbelievable.

With that being said, you have to put yourself in position to get good bounces and credit BYU for doing that.  The Cougars were better than any of the good guys thought and will go on to win 9 or 10 games this season.  They were a very physical football team and extremely well coached.

Also, the Huskies did put themselves in a position to win the game.  The defense made stops to get the offense the ball.  The offense drove far enough to give us hope.  Who knows?  If the last pass of the game wasn’t tipped we could be talking about a comeback win that will start a season of magic.  Instead, we’re stuck thinking, “Here we go again.”

It’s not all doom and gloom though.  We’ll take a look at that after the jump.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Huskies Football, UW Game Recaps

Good Guys’ 2010-11 NCAA FB Predictions

Leave a comment

Filed under Huskies Football, Predictions