Category Archives: Huskies Basketball

Posts dealing with Huskies basketball

Husky/Cougar Prediction Thread

I thought we should try this again.  With the Huskies and the Cougars in action tonight, post your prediction for each game in the comments.  Joe did a great preview of the Husky-*uck game earlier this week and predicted a narrow UW victory.  I’m thinking along the same lines.  I’ll take the Huskies 80-73 over the Ducks.  I think Quincy will have a good last weekend and IT might be getting hot.  (Bold predictions I know, the grass might be green and the sun might be bright.)

As for the Cougars, I think they win.  For some reason I have this thought that WSU is better than they really are and so I pick them to win a lot.  I’ll take the Cougars by 5.  Lets say 66-61 WSU.  Casto and MBA continue to be the best big men in the pac! 

Post your predictions in the comments, I imagine yours will be closer than mine!

2 Comments

Filed under Huskies Basketball, Uncategorized

Huskies vs. Ducks – Round 2

Thursday evening in Eugene, the Huskies will face their BFF’s, the Oregon Ducks. Everyone knows the two schools adore each other, should be a fun game. It’s the last time the Huskies will play at McArthur Court. Next season they’ll play at the Ducks’ new playground, Matthew Knight Arena (very popular among the folks in Oregon…).

Anyway, on to the game. In January I witnessed the Ducks defeat the Huskies 90-79 in what was clearly the Ducks best game of the year (after the win, they proceeded to lose ten of their next twelve, sealing Ernie Kent’s fate as a lame-duck coach (pun intended…)…) and probably the worst game the Huskies have played at home in at least two years. Malcolm Armstead and Michael Dunigan absolutely killed the Huskies with dribble drive penetration and toughness on the boards. Dunigan had 14 boards. Might-mouse Tajuan Porter was quiet in the first half, but came alive in the second from downtown. Oregon shot a sizzling 53% from the floor for the game, probably well over 60% in the second half. I came away thinking there was really no way Oregon was going to lose that game. Their whole team was in the zone. I give more credit to the Ducks for winning that game than for the Huskies losing.

On the UW side, it was clearly Matthew Bryan-Amaning’s worst game of the year. 21 minutes, 1point. Dunigan completely owned him all game physically. This game put MBA in Romar’s doghouse (again, pun intended), which I think has lead to MBA’s emergence over the past two month (more on that in a minute). The big three of Thomas (25pts, 11-12 FT), Pondexter (16pts, 6Rbs) and Overton (14pts) played well, I really have no complaints on the offensive end. Defensively, the Huskies were horrible. Armstead consistently drove past Overton and Thomas and had clean layups. None of the Huskies bigs got in his way and put him on his butt. Overall it was a sad defensive display by the Dawgs. Couple that with lights-out shooting by the Ducks, and you have the result.

No longer a black hole?

My how things have changed. Since that game, as I mentioned, the Ducks have fallen apart. There is no question in my mind Ernie Kent is gone. With a new arena coming next year, UO will look to make a splash with a new coach (Mark Few?). Because of this, the team has quit listening to Coach Kent. Granted they beat the LA schools this past weekend in LA, but they also swept them in Eugene earlier in the year. Can you say “favorable match-ups”? Therefore I don’t put too much into those wins. Against everyone else they have been lousy. At the same time, the Huskies have began to right the ship on the road, and MBA has emerged as a real threat on both ends of the floor. In fact I venture to guess he is the best offensive big man in the conference right now. No joke. He played extremely well against DeAngelo Casto, who leads the league in blocks, and has been consistently under control the past eight games or so. I haven’t been as hard on MBA as most people have been. I have always thought he has tremendous talent, he just needs to be coached up. In fact after the win at Wazzu Saturday, MBA credited none other then Jamaal “Junkyard Dawg” Williams for his post play improvements. I find it ironic and humorous that one offensive black hole is giving tips to another. (man, I loved Williams. Guy never saw a shot he didn’t like. He was a beast against UConn. Did I just mention the UConn game? DOH!!!).

Prediction? I see the Dawgs winning this one. They have confidence they can win on the road, they have the revenge factor working for them, and frankly they have more to play for. I expect MBA to play well, and look for Pondexter to bounce back after his first real down game of the year at Wazzu. This game, I feel, will come down to how MBA and Pondexter play on the block. Oregon’s guards are quick enough to keep up with Thomas and Overton. Maybe the trio of Suggs/Turner/Holiday will deliver some much needed offense, and bring it on defense. Frankly this game will come down to hustle, who wants it more on defense, and that’s where the Huskies will beat the Ducks. The only way Oregon wins this game is if they shoot lights out once again, and they have not proven in subsequent Pac-10 play they can replicate what they did in Seattle two months ago. The game will be in the 60’s, Huskies win a close one by 5.

-Joe

Leave a comment

Filed under Huskies Basketball

Quick UW-WSU Thoughts

Kind of a strange game.  Just a few quick thoughts:

  • Everything came together against the Huskies in the second half.  The Cougars came out with a lot more energy and seemed to get every bounce until late in the game, and questionable officiating gave MBA a third foul early that took away his aggressiveness, especially defending Casto.  I was never really worried they were going to lose, but it was just a matter of finding a spark to swing the momentum.
  • It looks like I was wrong about MBA.  He says he’s not doing anything differently, but he looks like he’s being more patient with the ball.  Who knows if it’ll carry into next season, but right now he looks like a potential all Pac-1o player next year.
  • Klay Thompson is really not a good player right now.  He seems like the prototypical streaky player who lets bad shooting affect the rest of his game.  He rallied a bit in the second half to make a few nice plays, but there was really no difference between him and Elston Turner last night, except that Thompson played a lot more minutes and missed a lot more shots.
  • I’m no expert on the Cougars roster, but I’d be a little worried if I were them.  I think Ken Bone’s a solid coach, but they don’t have too many difference makers right now.  Casto’s solid, but he doesn’t seem like a player who will ever be able to carry the team.  Thompson might, but he has to be more consistent and improve his demeanor and body language.  Reggie Moore is a solid point guard but nothing special, and I’m not sure he’s going to improve a lot on what he is now. They look like a team that will play hard and steal some games but lacks the talent to be a consistent threat in the conference.  I could be wrong, but I’ve seen nothing in their few games I’ve watched to tell me otherwise.
  • I wonder if Gaddy would have played much more in the second half if he hadn’t got that fourth foul.  I thought they badly needed him when they were struggling to score and Venoy was pretty well a non-factor.  Gaddy has a very settling effect and seems to get the team better shots.  Romar eventually pulled Venoy and let IT run the point, and then put Venoy back in once the tempo had picked up.  It was a good move, but he should have made it five minutes earlier.
  • Venoy has to learn how to get around screens better.  Teams that run a screen in the backcourt bringing the ball up take him totally out of his game.  Yesterday, he seemed to be watching for a screen along the three point line and would be caught out of position, letting Moore or whoever drive right by him.  Not his best game, although there’s no one I’d rather have shooting those late free throws.

Two more games.  The Huskies need to keep at least their third seed for the tournament so they’ll only face Cal in the title game, if at all.  That would be their only chance of an at-large bid, and even that is a tiny chance.  Go Dawgs!

-Matthew

Leave a comment

Filed under Huskies Basketball

Huskies vs. Cougars Prediction

I thought this would be a worth a try, we’re going to have a little prediction thread for the game tonight.  If this works we can do it before more games.  So, leave your prediction of the game tonight below in the comments section.

My prediction?  Sadly, my prediction is WSU 72-68.  I feel awful for predicting this but for some reason I just don’t see the dawgs winning this game.  Maybe because it’s another road game, maybe it’s because I lost some hope after the USC loss but this may be a nail biter.  I see Klay finally going off and scoring in the 20’s and Casto shutting down MBA’s improved post play.  Quincy will show up, like he always does but I don’t think it’s enough to beat the Cougs’ in their home finale.  I hope I’m wrong!

Post your predictions below! Go Dawgs!

Andrew

3 Comments

Filed under Huskies Basketball

Thank You Quincy

CLIFF DESPEAUX / THE SEATTLE TIMES

I just want to give a big shout out to the man of the night, Quincy Pondexter. Senior night, and he came out and dominated UCLA. I am happy to see him go out with a win, especially against the smug punks from Westwood. The Huskies played unbelievable, yet again showing they are the premier Jeckyl and Hyde team in the nation. I still maintain they win the next three on the road, but at this point what is the use in trying to predict anything in the Pac-10…

1 Comment

Filed under Huskies Basketball

This One is on Me

I was at the game last night, and there is plenty of blame to go around for the debacle that occurred. Despite a nice comeback, UW fell short, and the reality of needing to win the Pac-10 tournament to make March Madness is officially here. USC presents so many matchup problems for the small Washington guards, which made our offense look completely out of sync. Mike Gerrity, the Trojan point guard and leader on the floor, really takes control of the offense; he killed us last night. There are numerous reasons why UW lost for just the second time at Hec Ed this year, but really this one is on me, and here’s why.

In the past 3 seasons, Washington is a combined 46-10 at home, with a conference home record of 18-8 over that stretch. I have attended exactly one game each of the past 3 seasons, and each time we have lost. In 07-08, I witnessed a loss to the Lopez twins and Stanford. In 08-09, I sat courtside for the Cal triple-OT loss, and now last night, for just the third conference home loss in 2 seasons, I was there to see it as well. So stop pointing fingers for last night’s loss, because this one is on me. To Washington nation, I am truly sorry.

-Dan

5 Comments

Filed under Huskies Basketball

UW vs USC – The Battle at HecEd

Time to go old school on USC.

The UW vs USC smackdown at Hec Ed. I have been stewing over this game since Saturday, because, as other writers on this freight train of a blog have stated, tonights game is probably the UW’s toughest match-up. USC has always been a tough for the Dawgs. That’s doesn’t mean they own us, it just means the games always tend to be very physical and a grinder. Watching Jon Brockman and Taj Gibson throw each other around for four years was a treat.

Now for the geeky part. I am very comfortable and open with the fact that I have a very strong geek streak in me. It doesn’t help much with the ladies, but it does help when it comes to breaking down basketball match ups. Therefore, I have to plug the following website:

http://statsheet.com/

Stat Sheet.com is literally a cornucopia of stat goodness. The very definition of good, ratio, +/- juju. They have a great page for tonights match up here:

http://statsheet.com/mcb/games/2010/02/18/2010-02-18_southern-california_vs_washington

Based on the stat guru, the Huskies are an 8 pt favorite. Considering the UW has blown out most home opponents this year, and couple that with the tougher than normal match up, inside a 10 pt game sounds very realistic. I expect it to be much closer actually. USC thoroughly dismantled UW in their first match up. Pondexter had probably his worst game of the year, 2pts. Overton played well with 18pts, and was seemingly the only Husky player that showed up that day. I expect things to be very different tonight. Look for Overton to play well again, along with Isaiah. I am very concerned with USC’s strength, so I don’t see MBA, or any other player who mucks it up down low having a good night. I think this game could come down to outside shooting, especially Suggs and Turner from three range, and Quincy being able to knock down his 20ft jumpers. If the shots are not falling, the Huskies will need to crash the boards, which they are very good at, 1st in the Pac-10.

As always, the game will come down to desire and hustle. The Dawgs are a top 15 team at home. I like the fact that the UW has a bone to pick with both SC and UCLA this weekend, more motivation to play hard on defense and get physical on the blocks. I am looking for a close, hard fought victory tonight for the Huskies.

Joe

5 Comments

Filed under Huskies Basketball

An MBA By Any Other Name…

Every team has that player who fans insist has all the talent in the world, but can never quite put it together.  For the 2009-2010 UW Huskies basketball team, that player is Matthew Bryan Amaning.  An athletic big man who shows occasional elite skills, he just as often shows a surprised expression as the ball bounces off his hands out of bounds.  He’s played better the last few weeks, leading many to hope that he is about to become the dominant post player Dawg fans have hoped for.

I’m pretty skeptical. I think MBA will remain a semi-talented big man with good athleticism, bad hands and questionable basketball smarts.  But I think we are overlooking one important piece of the puzzle in our analysis:

Matthew Bryan Amaning is a pretty sweet name.

It’s deceptively simple. None of the three names are too weird, so at first glance the only thing out of the ordinary is that there are three of them, but that’s hardly uncommon.  Dig a little deeper.  He has two first names, or does he?  Is Bryan a second first name, or part of a hyphenated last name frequently missing the hyphen? Or is it a middle name he really likes?  I was always under the impression it was a double last name, but now I’m not sure.  Neither are TV announcers.  They fluctuate between calling him Amaning and Bryan-Amaning before usually settling on Matthew or MBA or nothing at all, and are undoubtedly relieved when he takes his frequent seat on the bench.  Maybe it’s a British by way of prep school thing.  And how do you pronounce Amaning? Is it AM-an-ing? or a-MAN-ing?  I’ve heard his own coach use both pronounciations in the same interview.

Wherever his meandering career takes us in the next 15 games and senior season, we will remain confused.  But we will be sure of one thing: MBA in the NBA would be a good time for all.

-Matthew

4 Comments

Filed under Huskies Basketball